Last night, I was watching The Mask of Zorro. I’d never seen it before, so I thought I’d watch it (it cropped up on Sky Movies).
I was sitting watching, and during the opening scenes, some stuff happens (no spoilers, if you hadn’t seen it). The scene ends with a fade to black. A good method to end an act of a film, and very often used for just such a reason.
As it faded out, the thought popped into my head ’20 years later’. The picture fades back in, and what does the subtitle say:
“20 Years later”
I nearly fell off my chair with that one; it was just so damned obvious! OK, so it was probably more fluke that I was right, but it still made me think about how obvious some of these things are. It’s a nice kind of obvious though. Sometimes we like to see where the story is going, the same way we like to know where the bends are in the road. I’ve seen films where pretty much the whole storyline is telegraphed out to you before the opening credits have finished popping up.
Good film though.
Sky have a new advert running at the moment for Sky Movies, basically saying how they’ll never interrupt with adverts. The advert features the Pearl & Dean theme, as used before cinema adverts. I knew the tune, but I had no idea what it was. A quick Google and I was downloading it from iTunes.
It got me thinking about the old Odeon idents from quite some time ago. This predates them merging with ABC cinemas, and it goes back to before the new multiplex was built here, so it’s probably about 15 years or more now. I recal the idents featuring some quite nicely done animation, which featured the camera slowly swooping down and around an Odeon cinema, before pulling back for an announcer to say something. It was accompanied by some quite bombastic eighties music, but I loved it. A few years ago I emailed Odeon cinemas to ask if it would ever appear elsewhere, or if there was some way to obtain the adverts (purely for sad, nostalgic reasons) but got a typically bland, canned response.
I just had another dig around and found nothing. A shame really. I couldn’t even find anything on Youtube or Google Video. So if you ever find anything, let me know!
Yup… I have to admit it. I’ve been watching a lot of Spongebob Squarepants lately. Yes, really. Stop laughing.
Seriously though, it’s one of those cartoons, like Animaniacs or Rocko’s Modern Life which is for more than just kids. There’s certainly plenty of slapstick and sillyness for kids to enjoy, but I can’t help but feel a lot of the jokes would pass kids by, but adults get them and laugh anyway. I love how the show mixes the odd bits of ‘live’ video with the animation too, sometimes in the same scene, other times flicking back and forth. It’s a nice concept, and it works well. The characters are good – there’s a depth to them that many other cartoons miss.
I saw The Spongebob Squarepants Movie the other day too, and was pleased to see it was basically a long normal episode – often when something is made into a film it loses something, but the movie was just as funny.
It really is great. Go watch it now!
I just watched Summer Rental, the John Candy film where his character takes his family away for a summer by the beach and they end up competing in the annual regatta. Its a pretty old film now (1985!) but I still love it. It’s a silly film – the kind of thing you can sit and watch on a damp Saturday afternoon. Much like today really.
Being an older film, there’s subtle differences you tend to notice, comparing it to contemporary films. The one I picked up on mainly was the fact that a lot of older films liked to throw in sound effects in very odd places, and quite often over do them. The one that gets me the most is the notion that dogs seem to bark almost constantly. Just having the dog in frame isn’t enough – it has to bark randomly, usually as the main characters are expressing some emotion, almost as if the dog was speaking with them. It’s a nice idea, but damn annoying. There’s a few shots in Summer Rental where you can see the dog walking toward the camera supposedly barking, but the dog is obviously not.
Similarly, there’s so many films featuring computers that bleep and boop their way through EVERY operation. Most computers I know don’t make that much noise. A good sound editor will sneak these things in, to just bolster the action, or underline something. If you notice it, they’ve obviously done something wrong in my mind.
Still, it’s a good film all the same.
I went to see Stephen Spielberg’s remake of HG Welles War Of The Worlds. I was a little apprehensive, mainly as I’d seen the original film, and heard Jeff Wayne’s version, and this being a ‘major’ Hollywood film, I half expected it to be riddled with special effects and no substance. Luckily, I was proven wrong. It didn’t have that typical feel of all remakes where you sit wondering what’s going to be cut out, or added in. It had the typical annoying kid in it who you actually WANT to die, just to shut up, but all the same, it’s still a solid film.
When I got home we dug out our copy of Jeff Waynes WOTW and the original book by HG Welles. I’m hopefully going to read that sometime, mainly to contrast it with the film. From what I understand, the original was really Welles indictment of the way the British were acting in Asia in the 19th century. I suppose this could be Welles’ “Animal Farm”.
As the original was published in 1898, the text is now off-copyright, so its on the Wikisource site here
So I have a week off! Yay! A couple of mates are in the area this week, so I thought it a good idea to take a week off and go do some stuff. We’re looking at seeing the new War of The Worlds film on Thursday. It looks like it could be good. I’m hoping it’s not going to be a mass of special effects. The trailer suggested it wasn’t, so I have high hopes at the moment. By Thursday I should know!
I just watched the film Spellbound. It was on Channel 4 last night and it looked vaguely intriguing, so I thought I’d have a look at it. Spelling Bees are something of an unknown here in the UK. Its an odd concept – a national competition in spelling words, most of them so wierd and convoluted you’re probably never going to need them. Yet its a really big event in the USA. This film is a documentary about the 1999 final, and follows eight children as they move up to the finals. All of the kids were from quite different backgrounds, so it was obvious race, religion and money had nothing to do with it. These kids were genuinely intelligent, and for the most part, surprisingly quite modest about it.
All of the kids seemed to be there because they wanted to be, but they were all happy that if they didn’t win, it wasn’t a big issue to them. They were happy to be there, and take part. Usually in these situations you find over-bearing parents pushing the kids incredibly hard, but that also didn’t seem to be the case. The parents were supportive, and very encouraging, but none seemed to be pushing the kids to do something they didn’t want to do. The motivation seemed to come from the kids, not their parents.
Overall, it was a nice documentary, and I’m glad I watched it. You certainly felt you were as good as there, under the spotlights, trying to work out how to spell a word you’d never heard of before. Good stuff!