davidrickard.net

Random stuff, randomly updated.

Archive for the ‘Rant’ Category

So long DSL

Friday, January 30th, 2009

After many years, I’ve finally done it. I’ve gone to Cable internet. And it’s great! (so far).

I’ve had ADSL for quite a while. When I first joined, which I think was around 2000/2001, the only option was BTOpenworld (or Openwoe as they were more often known), as the market hadn’t yet been opened up to competitors. At that time, you had to have an engineer install it for you, and there were a multitude of tests including the ‘woosh’ test, and line length tests. The whole thing was actually quite an ordeal, and your line HAD to meet strict specifications. All this for a 512Kb connection! You also had a modem provided (no routers) which was owned by BT, and you technically weren’t allowed to use anything else. When BTO started out, hardly anybody was using it, so it was amazingly fast and reliable.

Over time, that changed. More people piled into the service, and it got slower and slower. BT started allowing other ISPs to re-sell the service, and in such a way that you used their network, instead of BT’s, so the performance was often better. BTO became BT Yahoo, and the service declined sharply, although I was paying a lower price for being a good customer. In mid-2004, I moved to Zen. They were always getting a good press for their excellent service. A few months after moving to them, the restrictions on line types changed, and I was able to upgrade to 1Mb. Later, the option of ADSL max became available, which meant a much faster service (potentially) albeit with a download cap. I was soon able to get 3.5Mb, and all was well.

Then the ‘issues’ began. The line would drop out now and then, and not come back for extended periods. I tried all sorts of things, and Zen’s support were excellent. My line speed fell bit-by-bit I bought a new router, ADSL splitters, and tested all sorts of things, but nothing worked. The line would be fine for a while, then every few months throw a wobbler and fall over. Not a lot of use if you’re trying to use VPNs and other stateful apps like I do. BT tested the line countless times, and found nothing.

Be* were suddenly the new kids on the block, but also using the newer ADSL2 standard. I moved to them in February of 2008, and then had a slightly faster connection, and no download cap. It all went well for a while, and then the connection issues came back. I tried yet more to resolve it, but still no improvement. I found myself getting a maximum of around 2.5Mbs, so was going backwards in terms of speed. Not good.

Others had been telling me for ages how great Cable was, but I always maintained that the support was great with Zen or Be*, and the performance was good, so I didn’t want cable. I’d scoff at the caps, and stay put. A few weeks ago, after the latest connectivity issues with ADSL, I decided enough was enough, and signed up to Virgin’s 10Mbs service. I had it installed today, and it’s been wonderful! It downloads at the advertised speed, as opposed to an ‘up to’ speed. OK, the caps are a little annoying, and very easy to blast through, but it’s certainly liveable. All in all, it’s much fairer. It remains to be seen how customer service is as NTL/Telewest were awful way back when. I hear it’s improved, so that’s something.

So time will tell how it goes, but so far it’s very promising.

NEWSFLASH: It’s a SCAM!

Saturday, January 17th, 2009

Postman loses £130,000 savings to Nigerian internet scam after being duped by a friend he met on MySpace | Mail Online.

Leamington man loses $150,000 in Nigerian scam.

How are people STILL falling for these scams? There’s plenty of publicity about it, in print and on the TV, yet people still fall prey to them. I suppose it’s simple greed kicking in and overriding the truth. It’s like compulsive gambling – keep going, and eventually there’ll be a payout.

I suppose anybody reading this (all two of you) already know better than to go sending some random stranger all your money, all your friend’s money, and any other cash you can scrape together. It’s just amazing that to get so far in debt, these people actually end up doing ALL the things you shouldn’t do online.

Amazing, and quite sad for these people.

Oh, sorry about one of the links being the Daily Wail.

A monster of a cable – and it’s only 15 quid!

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

If you go buy a TV from Comet or Currys (or any out of town retailer), they’ll swear blind you need to pony up upwards of £50 for a Monster HDMI lead, which is 99% oxygen free, and was hewn from the very depths of the poles of one of Jupiter’s moons, and that with anything less, you’ll not be able to see every hair and blemish on Harrison Ford’s face when you watch Bladerunner on Bluray.

Cobblers.

0255342_lWith analogue connections (i.e. SCART), the signal made its way through as a set of subtle waves. The subtlety of those waves could be destroyed if the cable was of a poor quality. It could lead to flat colours, a ‘halo’ effect around people, or shadows in the picture. People would pay ridiculous amounts of cables which did make a difference, albeit subtle. To most folk, it was so subtle that it really didn’t matter. The hard-core home-cinema type would tell you until they were blue in the face that it made a difference, but it mattered not one jot to everyone else. There was such thing as ‘cheap’ or ‘bad’ cables. I’ve had a few, and they were poorly made, and poorly shielded, so they did produce a pretty dire picture.

Along comes HDMI, and it uses a digital connection. It’s all pulses. On-off-on-off-on-off. The digital simplicity of ones and zeros. With HDMI, if the signal gets through, it gets through. It either does, or it doesn’t. What that means, is that the cable either works, or it doesn’t. If the cable is ‘bad’ you’ll know it – big blocks on the screen, or odd sparkly colours, because chunks of the picture information is missing. It’s very similar to how Freeview breaks up when a lorry rumbles past your house.

Basically, you need a ‘decent’ cable. One that makes a good connection at both ends, won’t slip out or wobble, and shields itself from any interference from other cables, like power leads or speaker wires. These stupidly expensive cables are just that – stupidly expensive. I found the cable pictured at the right for £14.99 in Wilkinsons. It’s 1.5 metres, and has gold-plated ends (so they won’t tarnish). I’ve got three of them now, and they work like a charm!

Since buying an HD-ready TV about two years ago, I’ve slowly been replacing bits of my TV/Audio kit, as we gadgety-geeky types are often wont to do. In doing so, I’ve upgraded to Sky+ HD, and have upscaling DVD players and other fun things. As a consequence, all my kit is now connected via the HDMI. I used to have a spaghetti of SCART leads packed down the back of the TV. They were thick and bulky, and always drifting lose (a major issue with SCART).

Using HDMI cables has been good. I’ve actually got more HDMI devices than inputs on my TV, plus I need to send the signal in two directions to the TV and projector, so there’s a switch box in the mix too. All told, there’s about six HDMI leads in there now, including these Wilko cables. I’ve been using them quite happily for some time, and they give me perfectly good picture quality. The Sky+ HD box comes with an HDMI lead which is, to be honest, a bit cheap and nasty when you look at it, but even that works perfectly fine. As I say, a lead either works, or it doesn’t. My ‘best’ cable, is a Belkin lead I bought some time ago which was probably nearer £30, and that is no different to these newer, cheaper leads. Wilko actually sell cheaper leads still, and I think even they would work fine.

The Monster leads Comet and Currys push onto you are sold simply for the profit margins. The wholesale costs on them is closer to £10, but they sell them for about £50. They use it to recoup any losses they might have made price matching, and giving you a better deal.

That’s how they getcha!

Spammed… by CISCO!

Monday, November 17th, 2008

Well, more spammed-by-proxy.

I had an email today which purported to come from a lady called ‘Nicole’ at a company called ‘M80‘. A quick looksee at their website shows that they are actually into ‘Social media marketing and online publicity’. In my case, their person sent me an email using my contact form, telling me all about an upcoming webinar Cisco are hosting this Thursday about Unified Communications, something I mentioned in some other posts.

The email then goes on to give me links to blip.tv to preview the webinar (apparently I have to keep that off the record), plus some excerpted clips from the webinar which are on YouTube. Finally, there’s a link to the actual webinar.

And, here’s the cheek of it:

I hope you'll consider posting the video and link to your site; there's some
great UC info here and it's rare that we have in-depth video on the subject!

Well, make your mind up, dear!

Thing is… this is an unsolicited email. I didn’t ask to be told about Unified Communications, or presence or WebEx. I already know what they do. The email address it goes to is registered with Cisco for some CCNA stuff I did some time ago, but this actually came via my contact form. So this company are obviously paying people to Google for terms, then email or post comments on people’s websites. Truth be told, ‘Nicole’ is probably somebody working in India or China for a pittance, just filling in contact forms all day.

I think the thing that galls me the most about this is that Cisco are doing it – a company who recently invested in Ironport, an ANTI-spam company! They’re also working for companies like Dr Pepper, Ford, and 20th Century Fox. All big, reasonably respectable companies, or at least, as respectable as mega-corporations like those can be.

So looks like we have a new kind of spam to concern ourselves with.

"What? I didn’t pee on my hands."

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

washhands 

I just saw this on Graph Jam, and it made me think of the number of times I’ve seen people at work go into the toilets, relieve themselves, then just walk straight out without washing their hands at all.

It certainly makes you think twice if you have to touch their computers.

I’ve also seen people emerge from the cubicles – and based on the sounds and smells emanating from within said cubicles, it is pretty obvious what they were doing in there – then just walk straight out of the toilets without even going near the sinks.

Utterly, utterly disgusting.

Obviously, I can only base this on what males do. Maybe some are scared that washing their hands would somehow degrade their masculinity somehow? Who knows.

Bulk Update – not everything though

Monday, September 1st, 2008

Oh Cisco, bless your cotton socks.

I added a load of phones to CallManager today, and used the Bulk Administration Tool (BAT) for the first time. The phones imported happily, but I realised I’d managed to miss out some fields, like the caller line text; the phones will display the caller’s number and their name, assuming I set it. The BAT hadn’t added those fields (or rather, I hadn’t), so they weren’t present.

Continue Reading…

Never is enough

Friday, July 18th, 2008

HP shatters excessive packaging world record

Quite amazing. One big box, containing 16 smaller boxes, each containing two sheets of paper (which were also wrapped in foam, for some reason).

Talk about waste! That could just as easily all gone in a Jiffy bag or something. I always thought Cisco’s packaging for Callmanager licences was stupid – an A5 sheet of paper, in an A4 cardboard envelope, in a bigger oversized envelope.

At the very least, they do bundle up many of the A4 envelopes into one bigger one, but it’s still very wasteful. Oh, and add to that the fact each of those A5 sheets of paper is accompanied by a little wad of paper (in itself shrink-wrapped) called the ‘Information Packet’. Nice pun Cisco! All it contains is a warranty – a warranty for a bit of paper, probably.

I bet it doesn’t cover accidental shredding.

War on Drugs

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

Felony complaint filed against Barenaked Ladies’ Steven Page

Quite surprising. Amazingly bad timing too, considering they’ve only just released Snacktime, an album aimed at kids.

Drugs in music has always concerned me – so many musicians seem to be dabbling in drugs. Thankfully, they’re not all up to the levels of Amy Winehouse or Pete Doherty, but it seems to be a pretty universal thing. I stopped subscribing to Total Guitar magazine as I mostly got fed up with all the references to drugs in the interviews. I personally abhor their use; I rarely drink (I don’t get binge drinking), and smoking disgusts me, so drugs use is a massive nono.

I don’t understand why anybody needs to use drugs. Life can be hard at times, but not that hard, surely?

However, Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon was probably nearly all written under the influence of something, and it’s considered a classic album. Who’s to say what it would have been like otherwise? It might have ended up a footnote in musical history. I often wonder what the writers of Family Guy have been smoking sometimes – and I’m not being ironic when I think that, yet I’ll sit there laughing like a drain at it.

I suppose I’m a hypocrite really. Maybe I’ll just stop appreciating anything creative.

1.2 Gigabytes

Sunday, July 13th, 2008

What happens when you export your iTunes library to an XML file, then try and open it in Internet Explorer 7?

This:

ie12

It took me a while to regain control of my machine and kill it. I’ve got 2Gb RAM anyway, but when you consider a normal session for me is using about half that anyway (not Vista’s fault, more the junk I run), it was swapping out to disk like crazy. The end result being lots of swapping, and a PC which is barely useable. The XML file is about 12Mb, but obviously all the other stuff in the default XML stylesheet in IE adds a massive overhead.

I shan’t be doing that again in a hurry.

Blind faith in the little green man

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

No, not little green men from mars. I’m talking about the little green man we all look out for when crossing the road.

I was having a wander around during my lunch break at work the other week. I was crossing over the road using the pedestrian crossing. The light changed, and I felt my legs automatically hurling me into the road and across. At that point, it occurred to me that I hadn’t actually checked that there were no more cars coming.

Since that happened, I’ve noticed quite a few people doing much the same. They’ll stand and stare intently at the pedestrian signal. As soon as that little green man appear, they set off like whippets out of the traps at the dog races. They pay absolutely no attention to whether the traffic approaching has actually stopped.

Sometimes, it’s quite simple, as it’s a crossing on a straight piece of road, so I suppose even in their peripheral vision, it is possible to still see anything oncoming. Even so, it’s a bit of an assumption to make.

Similarly, I’ve noticed an increase in traffic light-controlled roundabouts. These are springing up all over the place, and I’ve found myself driving across them without really looking to my right. ‘It’s OK’ I think to myself – ‘the light will stop them’. All well and good, but a light won’t stop somebody who isn’t paying attention. Same goes for a pedestrian crossing.

I think in future I’ll be looking more closely when I cross.

Picture from Flickr by PhotoOptik